BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.6.1//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news5409@zasb.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20261027T115159
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20261113T161500
SUMMARY:Aymeric Bisoka (Mons University): The End of the White World: Rhêg
 mapolitics in the Afrocritical Tradition
DESCRIPTION:What if the deepest sign that a world is coming to an end were 
 not its disappearance\, but the fact that it is gradually ceasing to be ne
 cessary?\\r\\nThis lecture begins with a paradox. The world forged through
  the slave trade\, slavery\, colonialism\, racial capitalism\, and Europea
 n imperial expansion has by no means disappeared. Its material asymmetries
  persist\, its hierarchies continue to take new forms\, and some of its ca
 tegories still shape our present. Yet something has happened to this world
 . There was a time when Africa had to be explained from elsewhere\; when i
 ts humanity could be debated\, its capacity for thought questioned\, its h
 istory denied\, its ability to govern itself assessed\, and its future pla
 ced within a historical trajectory whose destination others claimed to kno
 w. This world did more than dominate: it claimed the authority to determin
 e the very questions that others were required to answer.\\r\\nFor more th
 an a century\, however\, African and Black writers\, philosophers\, artist
 s\, theologians\, activists\, and political thinkers have persistently eng
 aged with these questions—turning them around\, challenging their premis
 es\, reframing them\, and sometimes abandoning them altogether. From Négr
 itude to Afropolitanism\, from controversies over African philosophy to Af
 rocentricity\, from debates on Pan-Africanism to efforts to rethink and re
 invent democracy in Africa\, something has accumulated beyond victories an
 d defeats\, and even beyond answers that have since become obsolete.\\r\\n
 Drawing on a book in progress\, this lecture explores that accumulation by
  reconstructing the historical tradition I call Afrocritique and developi
 ng the concept of rhêgmapolitics as a way of understanding its political
  significance. I argue that this tradition does more than transmit ideas\,
  concepts\, or answers. Across generations\, it accumulates ways of breaki
 ng free from inherited intellectual dependencies\, transforming the very c
 onditions under which subsequent generations can think\, contest establish
 ed assumptions\, and formulate questions of their own. If rhêgma names t
 his process of breaking free from imposed frameworks of thought\, rhêgmap
 olitics captures the forms of political agency that emerge through it: th
 e capacity not only to refuse questions imposed by others\, but also to de
 termine which questions matter\, to act upon them\, and to shape the horiz
 ons of what becomes possible. The end of the white world thus names a part
 icular historical shift: not the disappearance of its power\, but the grad
 ual loss of its monopoly over defining what can be thought\, what can be d
 esired\, and what can be imagined as possible.\\r\\nWhat\, then\, remains 
 of a world's power when those it once constituted as its objects begin to 
 decide for themselves which questions are worth asking?\\r\\nAymeric Nyeny
 ezi Bisoka is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at Mons Un
 iversity\, Belgium. His research engages with the political ecology of nat
 ural resources\, the political economy of international interventions and 
 an afro-critical perspective on the social sciences. His work is based in 
 post-structuralism and a decolonial approach. His reflections on issues of
  epistemology\, methodology\, and ethics draws on his research in the Afri
 can Great Lakes region\, but is also informed by his ten years' profession
 al experience in the field of development cooperation in Africa and Europe
 . 
X-ALT-DESC:<p>What if the deepest sign that a world is coming to an end wer
 e not its disappearance\, but the fact that it is gradually ceasing to be 
 necessary?</p>\n<p>This lecture begins with a paradox. The world forged th
 rough the slave trade\, slavery\, colonialism\, racial capitalism\, and Eu
 ropean imperial expansion has by no means disappeared. Its material asymme
 tries persist\, its hierarchies continue to take new forms\, and some of i
 ts categories still shape our present. Yet something has happened to this 
 world. There was a time when Africa had to be explained from elsewhere\; w
 hen its humanity could be debated\, its capacity for thought questioned\, 
 its history denied\, its ability to govern itself assessed\, and its futur
 e placed within a historical trajectory whose destination others claimed t
 o know. This world did more than dominate: it claimed the authority to det
 ermine the very questions that others were required to answer.</p>\n<p>For
  more than a century\, however\, African and Black writers\, philosophers\
 , artists\, theologians\, activists\, and political thinkers have persiste
 ntly engaged with these questions—turning them around\, challenging thei
 r premises\, reframing them\, and sometimes abandoning them altogether. Fr
 om Négritude to Afropolitanism\, from controversies over African philosop
 hy to Afrocentricity\, from debates on Pan-Africanism to efforts to rethin
 k and reinvent democracy in Africa\, something has accumulated beyond vict
 ories and defeats\, and even beyond answers that have since become obsolet
 e.</p>\n<p>Drawing on a book in progress\, this lecture explores that accu
 mulation by reconstructing the historical tradition I call <i>Afrocritique
 </i>&nbsp\;and developing the concept of <i>rhêgmapolitics</i>&nbsp\;as a
  way of understanding its political significance. I argue that this tradit
 ion does more than transmit ideas\, concepts\, or answers. Across generati
 ons\, it accumulates ways of breaking free from inherited intellectual dep
 endencies\, transforming the very conditions under which subsequent genera
 tions can think\, contest established assumptions\, and formulate question
 s of their own. If <i>rhêgma</i>&nbsp\;names this process of breaking fre
 e from imposed frameworks of thought\, <i>rhêgmapolitics</i>&nbsp\;captur
 es the forms of political agency that emerge through it: the capacity not 
 only to refuse questions imposed by others\, but also to determine which q
 uestions matter\, to act upon them\, and to shape the horizons of what bec
 omes possible. The end of the white world thus names a particular historic
 al shift: not the disappearance of its power\, but the gradual loss of its
  monopoly over defining what can be thought\, what can be desired\, and wh
 at can be imagined as possible.</p>\n<p>What\, then\, remains of a world's
  power when those it once constituted as its objects begin to decide for t
 hemselves which questions are worth asking?</p>\n<p><strong>Aymeric Nyenye
 zi Bisoka</strong> is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at
  Mons University\, Belgium. His research engages with the political ecolog
 y of natural resources\, the political economy of international interventi
 ons and an afro-critical perspective on the social sciences. His work is b
 ased in post-structuralism and a decolonial approach. His reflections on i
 ssues of epistemology\, methodology\, and ethics draws on his research in 
 the African Great Lakes region\, but is also informed by his ten years' pr
 ofessional experience in the field of development cooperation in Africa an
 d Europe.&nbsp\;</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
